Migration DataEntry PF-649809 · Page 18 · Stamped OCT 10, 2026

Berlin Halts Migrant Hiring Quotas in Public Service as Unconstitutional

Berlin Justice Senator Felor Badenberg has halted migrant-background hiring quotas in public service after a commissioned legal review found them unconstitutional under the German Basic Law.

Programme
Migration Data
Filed
Reading
2 min
Berlin Justice Senator deems migrant quotas in public service 'unconstitutional' - InfoMigrants
Berlin Justice Senator deems migrant quotas in public service 'unconstitutional' - InfoMigrantsPhoto — AI-generated

Entry details

  • Berlin's Participation Law was passed in 2021 under then-Mayor Michael Müller's red-red-green Senate.
  • The law required at least 40 percent of interview candidates in public service to have a migration background, matching their share of Berlin's population.
  • A law firm's review, reported by Der Spiegel, found the quotas conflict with the German Basic Law.
  • Chief Public Prosecutor Margarete Koppers applied the quota at the public prosecutor's office, prompting Senator Badenberg's review.
  • Badenberg has suspended the quota-based practice and plans to amend the law with coalition partners.

Berlin's Justice Senator Felor Badenberg has halted the city's migrant-background hiring quotas in public service, declaring key provisions of Berlin's 2021 Participation Law unconstitutional after a commissioned legal review found conflicts with the German Basic Law.

What does the Participation Law mandate?

The Participation Law, passed in 2021 under then-Mayor Michael Müller's red-red-green Senate, requires that when inviting candidates for public sector positions, "at least as many people with a migration background must be invited to selection interviews as corresponds to their share of Berlin's population." That share currently exceeds 40 percent.

The law also requires that candidates with a migration background who meet the same qualifications as other applicants receive specific preferential consideration in hiring decisions.

What did the legal opinion conclude?

The Basic Law requires that public office appointments rest on suitability, qualifications, and performance. No applicant may be advantaged or disadvantaged on the basis of origin, gender, or ethnicity.

A law firm's review, reported by Der Spiegel, concluded that the Participation Law, if applied literally:

  • Conflicts with the principle of selecting the best-qualified candidate
  • Contravenes the constitutional prohibition on preferential treatment

What triggered the review?

The case surfaced at Berlin's public prosecutor's office, where Chief Public Prosecutor Margarete Koppers reportedly applied the quota in hiring. According to the Tagesspiegel, some highly qualified applicants without a migration background were excluded from interviews to meet the quota, while lower-ranked candidates with a migration background were invited.

Badenberg ordered a full review after learning of the practice. The review confirmed the constitutional concerns.

Why does Badenberg say the law must change?

Badenberg, who immigrated from Iran as a child, framed her decision in personal terms: "Precisely because I myself have a migration history, I know how important belonging and fair opportunities are. However, there is a clear standard for government action: the Basic Law is my compass."

She added: "Berlin needs to attract the best minds. Integration won't succeed through quotas, but through equal opportunities for all."

What changes for employers and applicants?

Badenberg has suspended the previous quota-based practice. She intends to apply the law only in ways consistent with the constitution. Candidates with a migration background can still receive invitations to interviews, provided the process does not compromise selection of the best-qualified applicants.

What happens next?

Badenberg plans to work with coalition partners to amend the law's unconstitutional provisions while continuing to promote integration and participation. Her office has not specified a timeline for the amendments.

How unconscious bias in recruitment can be prevented without quotas remains unresolved. The commissioned review offered no mechanism to address that gap.

via infomigrants.net (Original)

Share this article:

More from Nathan Brooks

Nathan Brooks

Show full bio

Correspondent covering marketplaces and e-commerce at Passport File.

271 articles

Onward routes

« Previous article

Machine readable zone