Borders & EnforcementEntry PF-318655 · Page 16 · Stamped SEP 30, 2026

US Immigration Judge Rules Salah Sarsour Deportable on Security Grounds

A US immigration judge has ruled that Salah Sarsour of Wisconsin can be deported on national security grounds, advancing a removal case under US immigration law's security provisions.

Programme
Borders & Enforcement
Filed
Reading
2 min

Entry details

  • A US immigration judge ruled Salah Sarsour can be deported on national security grounds.
  • The case was reported by PBS Wisconsin.
  • National-security allegations can ground US removal proceedings independent of criminal charges.

A United States immigration judge has ruled that Salah Sarsour, a Wisconsin resident, can be deported from the United States on national security grounds, PBS Wisconsin reports.

The decision marks the conclusion of one stage in a removal case that hinged on whether the government could justify deportation using national-security provisions of US immigration law. The judge found that the government met the threshold required to order Sarsour removable on those grounds.

Under US immigration law, the government may seek the removal of a non-citizen whom authorities deem a threat to national security. Such cases proceed before immigration courts within the Executive Office for Immigration Review, where an immigration judge weighs the evidence the government submits against the respondent's case for remaining in the country.

A removal order from an immigration judge does not always end the process. Respondents in US immigration proceedings generally retain the right to appeal to the Board of Immigration Appeals, and further review can follow in the federal courts. Any appeal must normally be filed within strict deadlines set by the immigration court system.

For non-cizens in the United States, the case is a reminder that national-security allegations can ground removal proceedings independent of any criminal charge. The legal standard the government must satisfy, and the avenues of appeal available to the respondent, are set out in the Immigration and Nationality Act and the regulations of the Executive Office for Immigration Review.

The specifics of the evidence the government presented in Sarsour's case, and any decision by his legal team to appeal, determine what happens next. Readers following the case should rely on official court filings and rulings for authoritative details rather than secondary summaries.

Passport File does not provide individual legal advice. Anyone facing removal proceedings should consult a licensed immigration attorney and refer to the Executive Office for Immigration Review and US Citizenship and Immigration Services for official guidance on how the rules apply to their situation.

via GN Deportations (Source)

Share this article:

More from Nathan Brooks

Nathan Brooks

Show full bio

Correspondent covering marketplaces and e-commerce at Passport File.

134 articles

Onward routes

« Previous articleNext article »

Machine readable zone