United Nations human rights experts have called on the United States to halt a Trump administration policy that deports migrants to third countries — nations with which the deportees have no prior connection — according to a report carried by Free Malaysia Today.

The policy in question allows US authorities to remove migrants not to their countries of origin, but to third states that have agreed to receive them. The UN experts argue that this practice exposes deported migrants to serious rights risks, because deportees may be sent to countries whose language they do not speak, where they have no family or community ties, and where they may face detention or unsafe conditions upon arrival.

The experts issued their call for a halt as the practice continues under President Donald Trump's immigration enforcement agenda. Their appeal adds international pressure to an administration that has made expanded deportation a central plank of its border policy.

Under the third-country deportation model, a migrant intercepted or detained in the United States can be transferred to a partner country rather than repatriated home. Rights monitors have warned that such removals can strand people in legal limbo: they may lack legal status in the receiving state, may be unable to file asylum claims there, and may have no realistic path to return to their families in their country of origin.

The UN experts' intervention is not legally binding on Washington, but it carries weight as a formal expression of concern from the UN human rights system. Similar expert communications have previously preceded broader action by UN treaty bodies and special procedures.

For migrants currently in US removal proceedings, the development signals growing international scrutiny of where deportations may be carried out, not just whether they occur. Immigration practitioners tracking the issue note that third-country removals complicate access to counsel, consular assistance, and asylum procedures, since deportees are moved outside the jurisdiction where their cases began.

The Trump administration has defended expanded removals as a deterrent to irregular migration and a tool for clearing immigration court backlogs. Officials argue that third-country arrangements give authorities additional options when origin countries refuse to accept returns or when removal to the home country proves impractical.

Migrants and advocates can monitor the situation through official US government channels. Removal policies and enforcement priorities are published by the Department of Homeland Security, and UN expert communications and press releases are available through the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights. Individuals with active immigration cases should consult a licensed immigration attorney for advice on their specific circumstances; this report does not constitute legal guidance.

The UN experts' call leaves the policy formally in place for now. Whether Washington adjusts its deportation practices in response remains an open question, and one that thousands of migrants in US custody now face as their cases move through the system.